US Military
Obama eligibility, US Military, Who can we depend on?, Who have we always depended on?, CNN Orwellian spin
Obama eligibility, US Military, Who can we depend on?, Who have we always depended on?, CNN Orwellian spin The Obama eligibility saga continues. The Constitutional crisis predicted by Philip J Berg has not diminished. The American patriot LTC Terry Lakin faces court martial this month. The Orwellian attempts by the mainstream media and even Glenn Beck to cover for Obama and misportray his eligibility persist. Recently Anderson Cooper gave a “Oscar winning” performance with his interview of Texas State Representative, Leo Berman. Big Brother, I am certain, is proud of Cooper.Read More
Terry Lakin, US Military, Stand by Lakin and military, Citizen Wells open thread, August 17, 2010
Terry Lakin, US Military, Stand by Lakin and military I have not forgotten about LTC Terry Lakin. I stand by him now and going forward. Lakin is a true patriot. Lakin’s superiors, if they do not uphold their oath to defend the US Constitution and question Obama and his orders, are cowards and treasonous. I am prepared to say it to their face. I received the following in an email this morning. Another reason to support our military. “The story is about Channing Moss, who was impaled by a liveRead More
Sullivan v. NC Secretary of State and Board of Elections, Update March 20, 2009, Lt Col Donald Sullivan, Obama not eligible, NC lawsuit, Judge W. Osmond Smith, III, Wake County Superior Court, Raleigh, NC, US Constitution, First Lieutenant Scott Easterling, US Military
I just received this update from Lt. Col. Donald Sullivan: “Personal Transcript of Hearing: Sullivan v. NC Secretary of State and Board of Elections; Case #08-CVS-021393 SUBJECT: Obama Eligibility On March 16, 2009, the calendar was called by Judge W. Osmond Smith, III, presiding, in Wake County Superior Court, Raleigh, NC. My case was #23 on the calendar and required the hearing of three separate “motions”: My demand for class action certification; my demand for leave to amend; and the State’s motion to dismiss. When he got to #23, theRead More