Philip J. Berg Press Release, No. 08-cv-4083, Philadelphia Federal Court, Obama not citizen, Hawaii, Kenya, Indonesia, Obama does not meet qualifications for president

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For Immediate Release

 

: –

08/21/08

For Further Information Contact:

Philip J. Berg, Esquire Suit Filed

555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12

 

08/21/08

Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531

Cell (610) 662-3005 No. 08-cv-4083

(610) 825-3134

(800) 993-PHIL [7445]

Fax (610) 834-7659

philjberg@gmail.com

Philip J. Berg, Esq. Files Federal Lawsuit

Requesting Obama

Be Removed as a Candidate as he does not meet the

Qualifications for President

(Lafayette Hill, Pennsylvania – 08/21/08) – Philip J. Berg, Esquire, [Berg is a

former Deputy Attorney General of Pennsylvania; former candidate for Governor and

U.S. Senate in Democratic Primaries; former Chair of the Democratic Party in

Montgomery County; former member of Democratic State Committee; an attorney with

offices in Montgomery County, PA and an active practice in Philadelphia, PA, filed a

lawsuit in Federal Court today,

 

Berg vs. Obama, Civil Action No. 08-cv-4083

, seeking

a Declaratory Judgment and an Injunction that Obama does not meet the qualifications to

ZFORMSPressReleaseObama08212008

 

2

be President of the United States. Berg filed this suit for the best interests of the

Democratic Party and the citizens of the United States.

Philip J. Berg, Esquire stated in his lawsuit that Senator Obama:

1. Is not a naturalized citizen; and/or

2. Lost his citizenship when he was adopted in Indonesia; and/or

3. Has dual loyalties because of his citizenship with Kenya and

Indonesia.

Berg stated: “I filed this action at this time to avoid the obvious problems that

will occur when the Republican Party raises these issues after Obama is nominated.

There have been numerous questions raised about Obama’s background with no

satisfactory answers. The questions that I have addressed include, but are not limited to:

1. Where was Obama born? Hawaii; an island off of Hawaii; Kenya;

Canada; or ?

2. Was he a citizen of Kenya, Indonesia and/or Canada?

3. What was the early childhood of Obama in Hawaii; in Kenya; in

Indonesia when he was adopted; and later, back to Hawaii?

4. An explanation as to the various names utilized by Obama that

include: Barack Hussein Obama; Barry Soetoro; Barry Obama; Barack

Dunham; and Barry Dunham.

5. Illinois Bar Application – Obama fails to acknowledge use of names

other than Barack Hussein Obama, a blatant lie.

If Obama can prove U.S. citizenship, we still have the issue of muti-citizenship

with responsibilities owed to and allegance to other countries.

ZFORMSPressReleaseObama08212008

 

3

Berg continued:

“Eighteen million Democratic Primary voters donated money, volunteered their

time and energy, worked very hard and then not only supported Senator Clinton, but

voted for her and often recruited other supporters as well. All the efforts of supporters of

legitimate citizens were for nothing because this man lied and cheated his way into a

fraudulent candidacy and cheated legitimately eligible natural born citizens from

competing in a fair process and the supporters of their citizen choice for the nomination.

Voters donated money, goods and services to elect a nominee and were defrauded by

Senator Obama’s lies and obfuscations. He clearly shows a conscience of guilt by his

actions in using the forged birth certificate and the lies he’s told to cover his loss of

citizenship. We believe he does know, supported this belief by his actions in hiding his

secret, in that he failed to regain his citizenship and used documents to further his

position as a natural born citizen. We would also show he proclaims himself a

Constitutional scholar and lecturer, but did not learn he had no eligibility to become

President except by means of lying, obfuscations and deceptions. His very acts proves he

knew he was no longer a natural born citizen. We believe he knew he was defrauding the

country or else why use the forged birth certificate of his half sister?

Americans lost money, goods and services donated in their support of a candidate

who supposedly was a natural born citizen simply because the DNC officers and party

leaders looked the other way and did not demand credentials to answer the questions and

prove whether or not Senator Obama was a legitimately natural born citizen, even in light

of recent information that has surfaced on websites on the Internet suggesting Senator

Obama may not be eligible to become President and questioning his status of multiple

citizenships and questionable loyalties! If the DNC officers and.or leaders had

performed one ounce of due diligence we would not find ourselves in this emergency

predicament, one week away from making a person the nominee who has lost their

citizenship as a child and failed to even perform the basic steps of regaining citizenship

through an oath of allegiance at age eighteen [18] as prescribed by Constitutional laws!

ZFORMSPressReleaseObama08212008

 

4

The injunctrive relief must be granted because failing to do so, this inaction

defrauds everyone who voted in the Democratic Primary for a nominee that is a fair

representation of the voters. Failure to grant injunctive relief would allow a corrupted,

fraudulent nomination process to continue. It not only allows, but promotes an

overwhelming degree of disrespect and creates such a lack of confidence in voters of the

primary process itself, so that it would cement a prevailing belief that no potential

candidate has to obey the laws of this country, respect our election process, follow the

Constitution, or even suffer any consequence for lying and defrauding voters to get onto

the ballot when they have no chance of serving if they fraudulently manage to get

elected! It is unfair to the country for candidates of either party to become the nominee

when there is any question of their ability to serve if elected.

All judges are lawyers and held to a higher standard of practice than a regular

lawyer. It is this Judicial standard that demands injunctive relief prayed for here. This

relief is predicated upon one of the most basic premises of practicing law which states no

lawyer can allow themselves to be used in furthering a criminal enterprise. And by that

gauge alone, failing to give injunctive relief to the 18 million supporters of the other

candidate, a true natural born citizen eligible to serve if elected, this court must not allow

itself to be used to further the criminal and fraudulent acts to continue and be rewarded

by becoming the Democratic Nominee. Failure to give the injunctive relief prayed for

will insure that a corrupted Presidential election process will only guarantee a show of

unfair preference of one group of people over another group by not demanding the same

rules be applied to all groups equally and fairly, especially in light of the fact that both

candidates are each considered a minority.

# # #






Related News

  • “Hillary Clinton is Evil Incarnate” David Schippers Free Republic radio April 2002, Chief counsel of impeachment of Bill Clinton
  • Schippers Exposes Impeachment Debacle, David Schippers interview by Insight Magazine December 8, 2000, Democrat Schippers book Sellout
  • Rosemary Jenks testimony April 30, 1997 before the Immigration and Claims Subcommittee, Judiciary committee of the US House of Representatives
  • Starr says Clinton ‘chose deception’, Clinton lied under oath obstructed justice and attempted to thwart not just Paula Jones’ sexual harassment lawsuit but Starr’s grand jury probe as well, House Judiciary Committee, CNN November 18, 1998
  • Judicial Watch finds pattern of lying by Clinton allies, Stephanopoulos sanctioned, Carville rebuked by court, Stephanopoulos warned on national TV of “Ellen Rometsch strategy” by “White House allies” to “bring down” perceived adversaries of Clinton Administration, Judicial Watch August 20, 1998
  • The Podesta cover-up, Top Clinton aide fighting impeachment, Implicated in cover-up of sale of Clinton Commerce trade mission seats for campaign contributions, Nolanda Hill testified in sworn affidavit and in open court, Judicial Watch September 23, 1998
  • Why is Clinton White House afraid of Dolly Kyle Browning?, Paula Jones witness prepared to testify in senate trial, Browning can testify to Clinton perjury threats and obstruction of justice, Judicial Watch January 11, 1999
  • Declaration of Dolly Kyle Browning March 6, 1998, Paula Jones’s lawyers released, Sexual relationship with Bill Clinton from mid-1970’s until January 1992, 1994 high school reunion encounter, “I agreed not to tell the true story about our relationship”
  • Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked as *

    *