Obama birth certificate, Media lies, Rupert Murdoch and Fox as bad as MSNBC, Orwellian misinformation Misleads Congress and Americans

“If I had my choice I would kill every reporter in the world but I am sure we would be getting reports from hell before breakfast.”… William Tecumseh Sherman

“The (American) press, which is mostly controlled by vested
interests, has an excessive influence on public opinion.”… Albert Einstein

“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it”…Joseph Goebbels

Well, Howard Coble, Congress and Americans, if you did not believe what has been written here and elsewhere about Fox and the mainstream media misleading the American public about Obama’s birth certificate, perhaps you will now.

From Citizen Wells July 16, 2011.

“The motives of Rupert Murdoch, the primary owner of Fox and other “news” organizations, have been suspect for years. Even Fox, which purports to be fair and balanced, misled the American public with Bill O’Reilly’s comments about researching Obama’s birth certificate, which was a lie, and the article a few months ago by Jana Winter which misquoted a OCR expert regarding the legitimacy of the WhiteHouse.gov image, another lie. So it comes as no surprise to find out about the latest unethical behaviour by Rupert Murdoch’s organizations.”

“Repercussions should rain down on Rupert Murdoch and his News Corporation
Rupert Murdoch’s withdrawal of his bid for British Sky Broadcasting should not be temporary. The scandal is expanding because employees engaged in unethical and, possibly, illegal methods of information gathering. Throw the book at them.”

“The scandal is expanding rather than fading because it is clear that Murdoch employees engaged in numerous dirty tricks to obtain information.

The FBI has opened a preliminary review into News Corp., trying to determine if employees hacked into the phones of victims of the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks. Agents are trying to figure out if they should progress to a full investigation and if U.S. law gives them jurisdiction to bring charges.”

http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2011/07/16/rupert-murdoch-organizations-unethical-methods-fbi-news-corp-probe-fox-misled-and-lied-to-americans-bill-oreilly-jana-winter/
From Citizen Wells July 3, 2011.

“Did Fox make a deal with the devil?”

“ The Saudi billionaire, Al-waleed bin Talal, is a friend of News Corporation chairman Rupert Murdoch and controls an influential number of voting shares in the company.”

“ The second-largest holder of voting stock in News Corp. is Saudi Prince Al-Waleed bin Talal, a nephew of the Saudi king. And through his philanthropies, Waleed has given generously to initiatives pursued by the imam, Feisal Abdul Rauf.”

“Glenn Beck stated he was  leaving with his soul on his last Fox TV show .”

http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2011/07/03/fox-and-obama-controlled-by-saudis-glenn-beck-leaves-with-soul-beck-seeks-honest-system-i%e2%80%99m-not-going-to-play-the-game-anymore/
MSNBC lived up to it’s reputation of covering for Obama with this article
“But Wisch, the spokesman for the attorney general’s office, said state
law does not in fact permit the release of “vital records,” including
an original “record of live birth” — even to the individual whose
birth it records.

“It’s a Department of Health record and it can’t be released to
anybody,” he said. Nor do state laws have any provision that
authorizes such records to be photocopied, Wisch said. If Obama wanted
to personally visit the state health department, he would be permitted
to inspect his birth record, Wisch said.

But if he or anybody else wanted a copy of their birth records, they
would be told to fill out the appropriate state form and receive back
the same computer generated “certification of live birth” form that
everybody else gets — which is exactly what Obama did four years ago.”

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/42519951/ns/politics-more_politics/t/ex-hawaii-official-denounces-ludicrous-birther-claims/
The first statement is pure Orwellian.

“But Wisch, the spokesman for the attorney general’s office, said state
law does not in fact permit the release of “vital records,” including
an original “record of live birth” — even to the individual whose
birth it records.”

Obviously they can not release the original. A true certified copy will suffice.

“Nor do state laws have any provision that
authorizes such records to be photocopied, Wisch said.”

Oh really…

“§338-13  Certified copies.  (a)  Subject to the requirements of sections 338-16, 338-17, and 338-18, the department of health shall, upon request, furnish to any applicant a certified copy of any certificate, or the contents of any certificate, or any part thereof.

     (b)  Copies of the contents of any certificate on file in the department, certified by the department shall be considered for all purposes the same as the original, subject to the requirements of sections 338-16, 338-17, and 338-18.

     (c)  Copies may be made by photography, dry copy reproduction, typing, computer printout or other process approved by the director of health. [L 1949, c

327, §17; RL 1955, §57-16; am L Sp 1959 2d, c 1, §19; HRS §338-13; am L 1978, c 49, §1”

http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/hrscurrent/Vol06_Ch0321-0344/HRS0338/HRS_0338-0013.htm

And how do we know this is true?

From the Post & Email April 10, 2011.

““What he got, everybody got,” said Fukino. “He put out exactly what everybody gets when they ask for a birth certificate.”

Not true, Dr. Fukino. When my son, Alan, requested a copy of his birth certificate he got just that—a “Certificate of Live Birth,” not the same as Obama’s.

Different titles and different information. Obama’s is sorely lacking information required for obtaining a passport—Mother’s State/Country of Birth and

Father’s State/Country of Birth.”
“It appears specific people are lining up to take a bullet for Obama. Conspiracy to defraud the American people is a serious crime and MSNBC has become the epitome of yellow journalism, brashly covering-up for Obama and the entire anti-American agenda of the socialist left. This latest cover-up attempt is laughable and speaks volumes to the desperation of the Democrat Party.

Michael Isikoff writes, “But Wisch, the spokesman for the attorney general’s office, said state law does not in fact permit the release of “vital records,” including an original “record of live birth” — even to the individual whose birth it records.

“It’s a Department of Health record and it can’t be released to anybody,” he said. Nor do state laws have any provision that authorized such records to be photocopied, Wisch said. If Obama wanted to personally visit the state health department, he would be permitted to inspect his birth record, Wisch said.

But if he or anybody else wanted a copy of their birth records, they would be told to fill out the appropriate state form and receive back the same computer -generated “certification of live birth” form that everybody else gets — which is exactly what Obama did four years ago.”

Not true, Mr. Wisch. A friend of mine filled out the appropriate state form and received back a “certificate of live birth” as shown below:”

http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/04/10/hawaii-official-and-ex-official-lie-to-cover-their-tracks/