Hollister V Soetoro, Philip J Berg, DC District Court, Judge James Robertson, February 4, 2009, Colonel Hollister, Motion for response time denied, Interpleader motion denied, Motion for pro hac vice in abeyance
From Phil at The Right Side of Life:
“Hollister v. Soetoro: Judge Denies Specific Motions in Pending Case
Submitted by Phil on Thu, Feb 5, 2009No Comment
The following Order from DC District Court Judge James Robertson was issued for Hollister v. Soetoro yesterday:
ORDER
Plaintiff’s motion to file interpleader and deposit funds with the court [#2] is frivolous and is denied. His motion to shorten time for defendants to respond to his complaint [#3] is moot and is denied. The motions of his counsel [#4, #5] for the admission pro hac vice of Philip J. Berg and Lawrence J. Joyce are in abeyance until the Court has had the opportunity, in open court, to examine their credentials, their competence, their good faith, and the factual and legal bases of the complaint they have signed.JAMES ROBERTSONUnited States District Judge
This order does not dismiss the case; it merely tackles certain, specific issues that the Plaintiff requested. A commenter on another forum expressed the same sentiment:”
Read more here:
« Tony Rezko talking, Blagojevich Indictment, Obama Indictment, February 3, 2009, Rezko moved, Sentencing postponed, Rezko cooperating? (Previous News)
Related News
Attorney Matthew DePerno: Four Shocking Discoveries from the Dominion Machines Audit in Antrim County Michigan Including Ties with China
Attorney Matthew DePerno: Four Shocking Discoveries from the Dominion Machines Audit in Antrim County Michigan IncludingRead More
Wisconsin 2020 election investigation approved by Assembly, WI legislature Jan 4 Resolution and Supreme Court declared illegal
Wisconsin 2020 election investigation approved by Assembly, WI legislature Jan 4 Resolution and Supreme CourtRead More