Blagojevich fake trial gets reported, William Cellini news altered, Obama protected

“Why has the mainstream media avoided coverage of the William Cellini trial? Why are Chicago news stories being scrubbed or altered?”…Citizen Wells

“Why was Obama in constant contact with Tony Rezko in 2004 when Rezko was conspiring with William Cellini to use TRS, Teacher Retirement Fund, assets for political gain and personal enrichment?”…Citizen Wells

“Connections could touch every somebody”

“Illinois is Six Degrees of Bill Cellini.”…John Kass, Chicago Tribune

The Blagojevich fake trial continues today with the jury returning after a 3 day break. The diversionary news about Blagojevich has been reported.

From Citizen Wells June 14, 2011.

“When was the last time that a Republican, with a history of shady deals, corruption figure connections, tied to Rezko, Blagojevich, et al, indicted for corruption involving a teacher retirement fund and scheduled for trial soon, was not being scrutinized, examined under a microscope and found guilty in the press?

Can you imagine such a scenario?

We have one now in the indictment and upcoming trial of William Cellini.

This is being very much underreported.

Why?”

http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2011/06/14/cellini-indictment-and-trial-coverage-republican-bill-cellini-not-being-scrutinized-chicago-tribune-article-disappears-protecting-obama/

This has become another “deer in the headlights” question. I have run this question by some of my more left leaning friends. They have no response or choose to withhold it.

I have another question for you. When was the last time that you saw a news organization the size of Citizen Wells get positions 1 through 4 and 6 in a major search engine search?

And of course we have the Chicago Tribune scrubbing their article of December 2, 2010.

And something suspicious happened with a Chicago Sun-Times article of a few months ago about Daniel Frawley, a Rezko associate.

Has something happened in regard to William Cellini that the big players know about or are they simply perpetuating status quo in protecting Obama?