Representative Tammy Baldwin, Wisconsin, US Constitution Hall of Shame, Obama not eligible, US Congress, Electoral College Votes, Obama’s eligibility must be challenged, WI Representative

“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the
Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and
domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same;
that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation
or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge
the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.”
Congressional oath of office

US Constitution

Hall of Shame

A letter received from Representative Tammy Baldwin of
Wisconsin regarding Barack Obama’s eligibility issues:

“Thank you for contacting me regarding President-elect Obama’s
citizenship. It is always good to hear from you.

As you know, some have suggested that President-elect Barack Obama
may have been born outside the U.S. and is not a “natural born citizen”
eligible for the presidency. During the presidential campaign,
President-elect Obama voluntarily posted his birth certificate on his
campaign website indicating he was born in Honolulu, Hawaii in 1961.
Media accounts report that Hawaiian officials verified health department
records and determined there is no doubt that Mr. Obama was born in
Hawaii.

You may be interested to know that concerns surrounding President-elect
Obama’s citizenship are the subject of at least one legal challenge
before the U.S. Supreme Court. However, on December 8, 2008, the Supreme
Court denied consideration of the claim that Mr. Obama lacks the
citizenship requirement to become president.

Again, thank you for sharing your views. Your opinion matters to me. If
I can be of service to you in any other way, please do not hesitate to
let me know. As a security precaution, all mail sent to Congress is first
irradiated. This process causes significant delays. To ensure the fastest
response, I encourage all constituents who have access to the internet to
contact me through my website at http://tammybaldwin.house.gov.

Sincerely,

Tammy Baldwin
Member of Congress”

Representative Tammy Baldwin stated:

“During the presidential campaign, President-elect Obama voluntarily
posted his birth certificate on his campaign website indicating he was
born in Honolulu, Hawaii in 1961.”

Wrong, wrong, wrong!

A COLB was posted on Obama’s site. It is believed to be fake.

Obama has never presented his birth certificate for scrutiny.

Obama has presented no legal proof that he was born in Hawaii. In fact,
Obama has spent hundreds of thousands of dollars and employed many
attorneys to avoid proving his eligibility.

Ms. Baldwin then stated:

“Media accounts report that Hawaiian officials verified health department
records and determined there is no doubt that Mr. Obama was born in
Hawaii.”

Hawaii Health Dept. Officials made no such statement. See below.

Ms. Baldwin then stated:

“However, on December 8, 2008, the Supreme Court denied consideration
of the claim that Mr. Obama lacks the citizenship requirement to become
president.”

Representative Baldwin, this is an important matter. Are you paying
attention?

Representative Tammy Baldwin, where are you getting your information?
Do you care about this country?

Why Obama is not eligible

What Hawaii Health Official really said

Latest information on court cases

From the Alan Keyes lawsuit

“A press release was issued on October 31, 2008, by the Hawaii Department
of Health by its Director, Dr. Chiyome Fukino. Dr. Fukino said that she
had “personally seen and verified that the Hawaii State Department of
Health has Senator Obama’s original birth certificate on record in
accordance with state policies and procedures.” That statement failed to
resolve any of the questions being raised by litigation and press accounts.
Being “on record” could mean either that its contents are in the computer
database of the department or there is an actual “vault” original.”

“Further, the report does not say whether the birth certificate in the
“record” is a Certificate of Live Birth or a Certificate of Hawaiian Birth.
In Hawaii, a Certificate of Live Birth resulting from hospital documentation,
including a signature of an attending physician, is different from a
Certificate of Hawaiian Birth. For births prior to 1972, a Certificate of
Hawaiian Birth was the result of the uncorroborated testimony of one witness
and was not generated by a hospital. Such a Certificate could be obtained up
to one year from the date of the child’s birth. For that reason, its value
as prima facie evidence is limited and could be overcome if any of the
allegations of substantial evidence of birth outside Hawaii can be obtained.
The vault (long Version) birth certificate, per Hawaiian Statute 883.176
allows the birth in another State or another country to be registered in
Hawaii. Box 7C of the vault Certificate of Live Birth contains a question,
whether the birth was in Hawaii or another State or Country. Therefore,
the only way to verify the exact location of birth is to review a certified
copy or the original vault Certificate of Live Birth and compare the name of
the hospital and the name and the signature of the doctor against the
birthing records on file at the hospital noted on the Certificate of the
Live Birth.”

wibaldwin






Related News

  • Schippers Exposes Impeachment Debacle, David Schippers interview by Insight Magazine December 8, 2000, Democrat Schippers book Sellout
  • Rosemary Jenks testimony April 30, 1997 before the Immigration and Claims Subcommittee, Judiciary committee of the US House of Representatives
  • Starr says Clinton ‘chose deception’, Clinton lied under oath obstructed justice and attempted to thwart not just Paula Jones’ sexual harassment lawsuit but Starr’s grand jury probe as well, House Judiciary Committee, CNN November 18, 1998
  • Judicial Watch finds pattern of lying by Clinton allies, Stephanopoulos sanctioned, Carville rebuked by court, Stephanopoulos warned on national TV of “Ellen Rometsch strategy” by “White House allies” to “bring down” perceived adversaries of Clinton Administration, Judicial Watch August 20, 1998
  • The Podesta cover-up, Top Clinton aide fighting impeachment, Implicated in cover-up of sale of Clinton Commerce trade mission seats for campaign contributions, Nolanda Hill testified in sworn affidavit and in open court, Judicial Watch September 23, 1998
  • Why is Clinton White House afraid of Dolly Kyle Browning?, Paula Jones witness prepared to testify in senate trial, Browning can testify to Clinton perjury threats and obstruction of justice, Judicial Watch January 11, 1999
  • Declaration of Dolly Kyle Browning March 6, 1998, Paula Jones’s lawyers released, Sexual relationship with Bill Clinton from mid-1970’s until January 1992, 1994 high school reunion encounter, “I agreed not to tell the true story about our relationship”
  • Browning Vs Clinton, Plaintiff’s expedited motion for leave to perpetuate testimony of threatened witnesses, Case No. 98-1991, Gennifer Flowers, Juanita Broaddrick, Linda Tripp, Monica Lewinsky, Paula Jones, Elizabeth Gracen, Kathleen Willey, Julie Steele, Sally Perdue
  • Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked as *

    *